Land use describes the human activities or economic functions that occur on land. Many environmental, economic and social factors influence how we use our land. In turn, different land uses can affect the environment, economy and society in different ways.
For example, the value of livestock, cropping and dairy farming to New Zealand’s economic activity has increased from nearly $2.7 billion in 1991 to nearly $5 billion in 2007. However, these land uses may damage soil health, which can lower productivity and increase surface run off. Excess nutrients can run off to fresh water causing excessive plant and algal growth that affects recreational, aesthetic and ecological values. New Zealanders surveyed in 2008 (PDF, 11 MB) perceive that farming land uses are major pressures on our soils and fresh waters.
In contrast, native land cover set aside for conservation or recreation places less pressure on our environment and is important for plant and animal biodiversity, ecosystem services, and for New Zealanders and visitors to enjoy our natural environment.
Land-use mapping from the Land Use Carbon Analysis System (LUCAS) shows land use in 2008, and reports land-use change since 1990. Land use is an indicator of pressure on the land, but is not the same as land cover. For example, pastoral land cover could be used for a number of land uses, such as sheep, beef, dairy or deer farming.
Additional information, such as stocking rates and productivity can provide information about land-use intensity. This information comes from the Agricultural Production Survey and the National Exotic Forest Description.
In 2008, natural forest covers about 30 per cent of New Zealand’s total land area. Scrubland, ‘other land’ (eg, alpine gravel, snow and ice), lakes and rivers, and wetland cover a further 10 per cent of the country. In 2009, about 33 per cent of all New Zealand’s total land area was legally protected for conservation or recreation purposes. This protected land is expected to have primarily native land cover, which generally occurs within the land-use classes listed above.
Collectively, low producing and high producing grasslands (likely to be predominantly used for agricultural grazing) cover half of New Zealand’s land area. However, some low producing grassland may have conservation or recreational uses. Low producing grassland tends to have low plant growth, and livestock tend to be grazed over large areas. In contrast, high producing grassland tends to have more intensive grazing and farm management practices, such as the use of fertiliser or irrigation to improve the land’s productivity.
Forestry land planted before 1990 represents about five per cent of New Zealand’s land area. New forest land (ie, land with forest present in 2008 but not in 1990) covers a further two per cent of New Zealand’s land area. Forestry land planted before 1990 and the majority of new forest land are both likely to be used for plantation forestry. However, a small proportion of the new forest land is likely to be forest used for protection purposes (eg, erosion or river control) or regenerating natural forest. Forestry can be a useful option for managing soil erosion. It also provides a sink for greenhouse gases and contributed over $1 billion to our economy in 2007. However, forest harvesting and replanting must be carefully planned and executed to avoid soil erosion and nutrient losses.
Cropping and horticulture land uses occur on about 2 per cent of New Zealand’s land area. These land uses consist primarily of seasonal crops, for example, vegetables, cereal crops or maize.
Settlements represent about 1 per cent of New Zealand’s land area, with over 70 per cent of New Zealanders living in major urban areas. Settlement expansion can result in the irreversible loss of our most versatile soils, and the health of freshwater fish communities tends to be poorer in urban streams compared to streams surrounded by natural forest.

Read a description of this image
Land-use class |
Description |
1990 |
2008 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (hectares) |
Percentage of total land area |
Area (hectares) |
Percentage of total land area |
||
Cropping and horticulture |
Annual crops or land cultivated for crops. Orchards and vineyards |
417,900 |
2 |
422,400 |
2 |
High producing grassland |
Exotic grassland with highly productive vegetation |
5,856,500 |
22 |
5,803,100 |
22 |
Lakes and rivers |
Open waters and riverbeds |
529,400 |
2 |
529,600 |
2 |
Low producing grassland |
Exotic and indigenous grassland with lower productivity vegetation |
8,016,900 |
30 |
7,705,800 |
29 |
Natural forest |
Forest and shrub that is not grazed around and is, or could grow to five or more meters tall |
8,152,600 |
30 |
8,101,900 |
30 |
New forest land |
Natural or planted forest present in 2008 but not in 1990 |
0 |
0 |
586,600 |
2 |
Forestry land planted before 1990 |
Exotic forest used for either timber production or protection, eg, erosion or river control. Includes harvested areas |
1,480,300 |
6 |
1,432,400 |
5 |
Scrubland |
Scattered scrub within or near grassland not protected or managed for regeneration |
1,184,700 |
4 |
1,059,600 |
4 |
Settlements |
Urban areas, towns and settlements |
203,400 |
1 |
206,100 |
1 |
Wetland |
Wetland with vegetation |
114,700 |
<1 |
114,500 |
<1 |
Other land |
Primarily bare of vegetation and not within settlements, eg, alpine gravel, snow and ice |
894,800 |
3 |
889,100 |
3 |
Notes: |
|||||
Data source: Ministry for the Environment.
About three per cent of New Zealand’s total land area changed land use between 1990 and 2008.
About 586,600 hectares of new forest land was detected between 1990 and 2008, while there were about 484,500 and 161,600 fewer hectares of grassland and scrubland respectively. Most of the new forest land is likely to be plantation forestry established on grassland or scrubland, for example, as illustrated around the Rotorua Lakes in the map below. New plantation forestry and regenerating natural forest may help manage some of the pressures on our soils and fresh waters, and increase plant and animal biodiversity. However, since 2004 there have been reductions in new exotic forest plantings and replantings following harvesting.
Between 1990 and 2008, about 50,700 hectares of natural forest and about 47,900 hectares of forestry land planted before 1990 were deforested; equivalent to nearly one fifth of the area of new forest land. This was predominantly due to conversion of forest to grassland, for example, around Taupo (as illustrated in the map below), and the conversion of natural forest to planted forest. Deforestation represents a loss of plant and animal biodiversity. Subsequent intensification of deforested land could lead to soil compaction, increase nutrients in our soils and waterways, and increase the risk of soil erosion.
The area of land used for cropping and horticulture has increased by 4,500 hectares since 1990. Most of the increase has been from the establishment of horticulture (eg, orchards and vineyards) on cropping and grassland. This coincides with the contribution of horticulture production to New Zealand’s economy nearly doubling during this time.

Read a description of this image
Land-use class |
Change in hectares |
||
|---|---|---|---|
Loss |
Gain |
Net | |
Cropping and horticulture |
5,000 |
9,500 |
4,500 |
High producing grassland |
117,800 |
64,400 |
-53,400 |
Lakes and rivers |
0 |
200 |
200 |
Low producing grassland |
366,700 |
55,700 |
-311,000 |
Natural forest |
50,700 |
|
488,000 |
New forest land |
|
586,600 |
|
Forestry land planted before 1990 |
47,900 |
|
|
Scrubland |
161,600 |
36,400 |
-125,100 |
Settlements |
100 |
2,800 |
2,600 |
Wetland |
100 |
0 |
-100 |
Other land |
6,500 |
800 |
-5,600 |
Notes:
|
|||
Data source: Ministry for the Environment.
New Zealand has the second largest proportion of grassland out of 30 OECD countries and the sixth largest proportion of forest. The comparatively high proportion of grassland reflects the high contribution of livestock, cropping and dairy farming to the New Zealand economy. In contrast, New Zealand has the second smallest proportion of land used for cropping and horticulture and the smallest proportion of ‘other land’.

Read a description of this image
Land use |
Grassland |
Forest |
Cropping and horticulture |
Other land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Country |
||||
Australia |
51 |
21 |
6 |
21 |
New Zealand |
51 |
42 |
2 |
5 |
UK |
46 |
12 |
24 |
18 |
Ireland |
44 |
10 |
18 |
29 |
Mexico |
41 |
33 |
14 |
12 |
Greece |
36 |
29 |
29 |
6 |
Netherlands |
29 |
11 |
29 |
31 |
Switzerland |
27 |
31 |
11 |
31 |
USA |
26 |
33 |
19 |
22 |
Luxembourg |
26 |
34 |
24 |
16 |
Iceland |
23 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
Austria |
22 |
47 |
18 |
14 |
Spain |
21 |
36 |
37 |
6 |
Portugal |
19 |
41 |
21 |
18 |
Turkey |
19 |
13 |
35 |
33 |
France |
18 |
28 |
36 |
18 |
Belgium |
17 |
22 |
29 |
32 |
Italy |
15 |
34 |
35 |
16 |
Germany |
14 |
32 |
35 |
19 |
Czech Rep |
13 |
34 |
43 |
11 |
Hungary |
12 |
22 |
54 |
13 |
Poland |
11 |
30 |
41 |
18 |
Slovak R |
11 |
40 |
29 |
20 |
Denmark |
8 |
12 |
53 |
27 |
Canada |
2 |
34 |
5 |
59 |
Sweden |
1 |
67 |
7 |
25 |
Japan |
1 |
68 |
13 |
18 |
Korea |
1 |
63 |
18 |
17 |
Norway |
1 |
31 |
3 |
66 |
Finland |
0 |
74 |
7 |
19 |
Data source: OECD Environmental Data Compendium 2008: Land
Move to the next land indicator: soil health.
Last updated: January 2011